yes, it has always been this way.
New gadgets replacing old ones,
new boyfriend displacing previous one,
Novelty of new ideas challenging the foundations of old theses.
It has always been.
But must it always be?
Must all things old be condemned? Is there no value still significant in old things?
Then who should decide what is branded "old"? how does such a yardstick works?
I grieve for people who only look ahead, with no regard to what brought them there in the 1st place.
I grieve for the demise of our BLK C diary.
Good bye and damned you are, cos the forum has replaced you.
For the Forum promises much better participation from all than u.
For the simple fact that you are no more in need.
To all the authors of past posts, i suggest u copy ur piece in one little file called: obsolete writings.
Cos tts how previous old posts are being treated here.
I grieve.
No comments:
Post a Comment